4.7 Article

Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Revascularization Insights From VOYAGER PAD

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 18, Pages 1768-1778

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.052

Keywords

outcomes; peripheral artery disease; revascularization

Funding

  1. Bayer
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  3. Medtronic
  4. Boston Scientific
  5. Philips
  6. Bard
  7. Surmodics
  8. TriReme
  9. American Heart Association Strategically Focused Research Network in Vascular Disease [18SFRN3390085, 18SFRN33960262]
  10. Janssen
  11. Amgen
  12. Merck
  13. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  14. Phillips Healthcare
  15. Cook LTD
  16. CPC Clinical Research
  17. Abbott Vascular
  18. Boston Science
  19. BD Bard
  20. Cook Medical
  21. Philips Medical
  22. NIH/NHLBI [K23HjL150290]
  23. Harvard Medical School's Shore Faculty Development Award
  24. AstraZeneca
  25. BD
  26. Cook
  27. CSI
  28. Laminate Medical
  29. Bayer AG
  30. NovoNordisk
  31. Pfizer
  32. Sanofi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the use of paclitaxel drug-coated devices in patients undergoing peripheral artery disease lower extremity revascularization was not associated with mortality or major adverse limb events, but was associated with a persistent reduction in unplanned index limb revascularization.
BACKGROUND Paclitaxel drug-coated devices (DCDs) were developed to improve tower extremity revascutarization (LER) patency in peripheral artery disease (PAD) but have been associated with tong-term mortality. OBJECTIVES This study assessed DCD safety and effectiveness in LER for PAD. METHODS VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD) randomized patients with PAD who underwent LER to rivaroxaban or placebo. The primary VOYAGER PAD study efficacy and safety outcomes were composite cardiovascular and limb events and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. For prespecified DCD analyses, primary safety and effectiveness outcomes were mortality and unplanned index limb revascularization (UILR). Major adverse limb events (MALE) were a secondary outcome. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to account for each subject's propensity for DCD treatment. Effects of rivaroxaban were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Among 4,316 patients who underwent LER, 3,478 (80.6%) were treated for claudication, and 1,342 (31.1%) received DCDs. Median follow-up was 31 months, vital status was ascertained in 99.6% of patients, and there were 394 deaths. After weighting, DCDs were not associated with mortality (HR: 0.95; 95% 0: 0.83-1.09) or MALE (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90-1.30) but were associated with reduced UILR (3-year Kaplan-Meier: 21.5% vs 24.6%; HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). Irrespective of DCD use, consistent benefit of rivaroxaban for composite cardiovascular and limb events (P-interaction = 0.88) and safety of rivaroxaban with respect to bleeding (P-in(teraction) 0.57) were observed. CONCLUSIONS In >4,000 patients with PAD who underwent LER, DCDs were not associated with mortality or MALE but were associated with persistent reduction in UILR. These findings provide insight into the safety and effectiveness of DCDs in PAD. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available