4.8 Article

Direct Measurement of Interhelical DNA Repulsion and Attraction by Quantitative Cross-Linking

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages 1718-1728

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c11122

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 GM132899, R35 GM131777]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed a disulfide cross-linking approach, xHEED, to measure the distance-dependent encounter frequency of DNA helices in solution. Our measurements define the relevant distances for electrostatic interactions of nucleic-acid helices and provide insights into the impact of different ionic conditions on these forces.
To better understand the forces that mediate nucleic acid compaction in biology, we developed the disulfide cross-linking approach xHEED (X-linking of Helices to measure Electrostatic Effects at Distance) to measure the distance-dependent encounter frequency of two DNA helices in solution. Using xHEED, we determined the distance that the electrostatic potential extends from DNA helices, the dependence of this distance on ionic conditions, and the magnitude of repulsion when two helices approach one another. Across all conditions tested, the potential falls to that of the bulk solution within is 15 angstrom of the major groove surface. For separations of similar to 30 angstrom, we measured a repulsion of 1.8 kcal/mol in low monovalent ion concentration (30 mM Na+), with higher Na+ concentrations ameliorating this repulsion, and 2 M Na+ or 100 mM Mg2+ eliminating it. Strikingly, we found full screening at very low Co3+ concentrations and net attraction at higher concentrations, without the higher-order DNA condensation that typically complicates studies of helical attraction. Our measurements define the relevant distances for electrostatic interactions of nucleic-acid helices in biology and introduce a new method to propel further understanding of how these forces impact biological processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available