4.6 Article

Identifying effective intervention components for smoking cessation: a factorial screening experiment

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 129-141

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.13162

Keywords

Chronic care smoking treatment; comparative effectiveness; factorial experiment; Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST); nicotine replacement therapy; Phase-Based Model of smoking treatment; primary care; smoking cessation; tobacco dependence

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [9P50CA143188, 1K05CA139871]
  2. Wisconsin Partnership Program
  3. NIH [P50DA10075, R01DK097364]
  4. National Research Service Award from the Health Resources and Services Administration [T32HP10010]
  5. Merit Review Award from the US Department of Veterans Affairs [101CX00056]
  6. NSF [DMS-1305725]
  7. Eli Lilly and Company
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1305725] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To identify promising intervention components intended to help smokers to attain and maintain abstinence in their quit smoking attempts. DesignA fully crossed, six-factor randomized fractional factorial experiment. SettingEleven primary care clinics in southern Wisconsin, USA. ParticipantsA total of 637 adult smokers (55% women, 88% white) motivated to quit smoking who visited primary care clinics. InterventionsSix intervention components designed to prepare smokers to quit, and achieve and maintain abstinence (i.e. for the preparation, cessation and maintenance phases of smoking treatment): (1) preparation nicotine patch versus none; (2) preparation nicotine gum versus none; (3) preparation counseling versus none; (4) intensive cessation in-person counseling versus minimal; (5) intensive cessation telephone counseling versus minimal; and (6) 16 versus 8weeks of combination nicotine replacement therapy (nicotine patch + nicotine gum). MeasurementsSeven-day self-reported point-prevalence abstinence at 16weeks. FindingsPreparation counseling significantly improved week 16 abstinence rates (P = .04), while both forms of preparation nicotine replacement therapy interacted synergistically with intensive cessation in-person counseling (P<0.05). Conversely, intensive cessation phone counseling and intensive cessation in-person counseling interacted antagonistically (P<0.05)these components produced higher abstinence rates by themselves than in combination. ConclusionsPreparation counseling and the combination of intensive cessation in-person counseling with preparation nicotine gum or patch are promising intervention components for smoking and should be evaluated as an integrated treatment package.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available