A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher

Background and Objectives To compare the immediate operating room (OR), inpatient, and overall costs between three surgical modalities among women with endometrial cancer (EC) and Class III obesity or higher. Methods A multicentre prospective observational study examined outcomes of women, with early stage EC, treated surgically. Resource use was collected for OR costs including OR time, equipment, and inpatient costs. Median OR, inpatient, and overall costs across surgical modalities were analyzed using an Independent-Samples Kruskal-Wallis Test among patients with BMI >= 40. Results Out of 520 women, 103 had a BMI >= 40. Among women with BMI >= 40: median OR costs were $4197.02 for laparotomy, $5524.63 for non-robotic assisted laparoscopy, and $7225.16 for robotic-assisted laparoscopy (p < 0.001) and median inpatient costs were $5584.28 for laparotomy, $3042.07 for non-robotic assisted laparoscopy, and $1794.51 for robotic-assisted laparoscopy (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the median overall costs: $10 291.50 for laparotomy, $8412.63 for non-robotic assisted laparoscopy, and $9002.48 for robotic-assisted laparoscopy (p = 0.185). Conclusion There was no difference in overall costs between the three surgical modalities in patient with BMI >= 40. Given the similar costs, any form of minimally invasive surgery should be promoted in this population.

Automated summary

Compared the immediate operating room (OR), inpatient, and overall costs between three surgical modalities among women with endometrial cancer and Class III obesity or higher, it was found that there were lower costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopy in both OR and inpatient, with no significant difference in overall costs.