3.9 Article

Periimplant Bone Response in Human- Retrieved, Clinically Stable, Successful, and Functioning Dental Implants After a Long-Term Loading Period: A Report of 17 Cases From 4 to 20 Years

Journal

IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 380-386

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000415

Keywords

bone-to-implant contact; histomorphometry; osseointegration; removed implants

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, University and Research (M.I.U.R.), Rome, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed at a histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the periimplant tissues and bone-titanium interface reactions in successfully osseointegrated, clinically stable, and immobile human titanium dental implants retrieved after a long loading period. Materials and Methods: In the last 30 months (2013-2015), 21 implants, retrieved from individuals for different causes after a loading period ranging from 4 to 20 years, were sent to the Implant Retrieval Center, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy. In 4 cases, almost all the bone had been lost during the retrieval, whereas in the remaining 17 cases, mineralized bone was still present. Results: Around the majority of the implants, mature compact bone with few marrow spaces was found. The trabecular bone, constituted by a few thin bone trabeculae, was in a periimplant location around only a few implants. A high percentage of bone-implant contact (BIC) (comprised between 32 +/- 4.1% and 83 +/- 2.9%) was present. In almost all implants, the space within the threads was almost completely filled by compact lamellar bone or by a thin layer of bone. Close and tight contact between bone and implant surface was observed in all specimens with no gaps or connective tissue at the interface. Conclusions: All implants appeared to be well integrated in the surrounding mineralized bone, and all of them showed adequate boneto- implant contact percentages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available