4.4 Article

Surveying Structural Complexity in Quantum Many-Body Systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS
Volume 187, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-022-02895-6

Keywords

Quantum Ising; Bose hubbard; Complexity; Quantum complexity; Quantum model; Stochastic process

Funding

  1. Foundational Questions Institute [FQXi-RFP-1809]
  2. Fetzer Franklin Fund (Silicon Valley Community Foundation)
  3. Singapore Quantum Engineering Program [QEP-SF3]
  4. Singapore National Research Foundation Fellowship [NRF-NRFF2016-02]
  5. Imperial College Borland Fellowship in Mathematics
  6. Lee Kuan Yew Endowment Fund (Postdoctoral Fellowship)
  7. Singapore Ministry of Education Tier 1 grant [RG162/19]
  8. FQXi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the structural complexity of quantum many-body systems using tools from complexity science. By examining the one-dimensional quantum Ising and Bose-Hubbard models, the researchers find that different information-theoretic measures of complexity can identify different features of these models.
Quantum many-body systems exhibit a rich and diverse range of exotic behaviours, owing to their underlying non-classical structure. These systems present a deep structure beyond those that can be captured by measures of correlation and entanglement alone. Using tools from complexity science, we characterise such structure. We investigate the structural complexities that can be found within the patterns that manifest from the observational data of these systems. In particular, using two prototypical quantum many-body systems as test cases-the one-dimensional quantum Ising and Bose-Hubbard models-we explore how different information-theoretic measures of complexity are able to identify different features of such patterns. This work furthers the understanding of fully-quantum notions of structure and complexity in quantum systems and dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available