3.9 Article

Histomorphological and Histomorphometric Analyses of Grade IV Commercially Pure Titanium and Grade V Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy Implant Substrates: An In Vivo Study in Dogs

Journal

IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 650-655

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000448

Keywords

dental implants; titanium; alloy; osseointegration

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [309475/2014-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the bone response to grade IV commercially pure titanium ( G4) relative to Ti-6Al-4V ( G5). Materials and Methods: Implant surface topography was characterized by optical interferometry and scanning electron microscopy ( SEM). Thirty-six implants ( Signo Vinces, n = 18 per group) were installed in the radius of 18 dogs. The animals were killed at 1, 3, and 6 weeks, resulting in 6 implants per group and time in vivo for bone morphology, bone-to-implant contact ( BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy ( BAFO) evaluation. Results: SEM depicted a more uniform topography of G4 than G5. Surfaces were statistically homogeneous for Sa, Sq, and Sdr. At 1 week, new bone formation was observed within the healing connective tissue in contact with the implant surface. At 3 weeks, new bone in direct contact with the implant surface was observed at all bone regions. At 6 weeks, the healing chambers filled with woven bone depicted an onset of replacement by lamellar bone. No significant effect of substrate was detected. Time presented an effect on BIC and BAFO ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: Both titanium substrates were biocompatible and osseoconductive at the bone tissue level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available