4.6 Article

Effects of plyometric jump training versus power training using free weights on measures of physical fitness in youth male soccer players

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 130-137

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1976570

Keywords

Resistance training; stretch-shortening cycle; athletic performance; youth athletes; football

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that both power training and plyometric-jump training have significant positive effects on physical fitness in prepubertal male soccer players. Power training may have an advantage over plyometric-jump training in improving acceleration and muscle strength.
This study aimed to contrast the effects of power training (PT) and plyometric-jump-training (PJT) programmes on measures of physical fitness in prepubertal male soccer players. Thirty-three participants were randomly allocated to PT group (n = 11), PJT group (n = 11), and an active control group (CG; n = 11). Before and after 12 weeks of training, tests were performed for the assessment of sprint-speed , change-of-direction (CoD) speed, muscular strength , and aerobic-endurance (AE). Findings indicated significant groupxtime interaction effects for all sprint-speed intervals, CoD speed, AE, and strength (d = 0.20-0.32). Post-hoc analyses revealed significant, moderate-to-large improvements in all sprint-speed intervals, CoD speed, AE, and muscle strength following PT (ES = 0.71 to 1.38). The PJT induced significant, moderate-to-large enhancements in 10 m, 20 m, and 30 m sprint, CoD speed, and AE (ES = 0.51 to 0.96) with no significant changes for 5 m sprint-speed and muscle strength (ES = 0.71 and 0.16, respectively). No significant pre-post changes were observed for the CG . Overall, PT and PJT are effective means to improve various measures of physical fitness in prepubertal male soccer players. Notably, to additionally improve acceleration and muscle strength, PT has an advantage over PJT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available