4.6 Article

Influence of footwear, foot-strike pattern and step frequency on spatiotemporal parameters and lower-body stiffness in running

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 299-309

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1992884

Keywords

Barefoot; foot-strike angle; long-distance running; spring-mass model; stiffness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the condition of footwear, foot-strike pattern, and step frequency affect the spatiotemporal parameters and lower-body stiffness during running. Barefoot running showed higher stiffness compared to shod running for both foot-strike patterns, with stiffness increasing as step frequency increased.
This study aimed to determine the influence of footwear condition, foot-strike pattern and step frequency on running spatiotemporal parameters and lower-body stiffness during treadmill running. Thirty-one amateur endurance runners performed a two-session protocol (shod and barefoot). Each session consisted of two trials at 12 km center dot h(-1) over 5 minutes altering step frequency every minute (150, 160, 170, 180 and 190 spm). First, participants were instructed to land with the heel first; after completion, the same protocol was repeated landing with the forefoot first. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed significant differences for footwear condition, foot-strike pattern and step frequency for each variable: percent contact time, percent flight time, vertical stiffness and leg stiffness (all p < 0.001). The results demonstrate greater estimated vertical and leg stiffness when running barefoot for both foot-strike patterns showing the largest values for barefoot+forefoot condition. Likewise, both vertical and leg stiffness became greater as step frequency increased. The proper manipulation of these variables facilitates our understanding of running performance and assist in training programmes design and injury management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available