4.5 Article

Why could sleep medicine never do without polysomnography?

Journal

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13541

Keywords

biomarker; obstructive sleep apnea; polysomnography; sleep precision medicine; sociology of sleep

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the central role of polysomnography in the field of sleep medicine, not only providing scientific data but also representing an obligatory passage point (OPP) that crystallizes debates, integrates data, and facilitates common language, strengthening the discipline of sleep medicine.
Given the clinical, methodological, conceptual and modelling challenges within the field of sleep medicine, polysomnography (PSG) has emerged as a central diagnostic tool over time. It has been highly beneficial to clinical practice over the years, thanks to the scientific data that it provides. More recently, sleep medicine has sought answers in precision medicine, broadening its quest for biomarkers that take into account environmental factors, big data, and nosological refinement. However, despite these innovative developments that are relatively independent of PSG, sleep medicine remains intimately associated with the latter. The aim of this paper was to show the central role of PSG for sleep medicine. Indeed, PSG is central to sleep medicine, not only due to the empirical data it provides but also because it represents an obligatory passage point (OPP) within the discipline. It crystallizes debate, pulls disparate types of data together, and facilitates a common language for the different specialties involved in sleep medicine, thereby lending legitimacy and credibility to the specialty. Thus, the role of polysomnography as an OPP in the field of sleep medicine reinforces the discipline, especially because critics (e.g., of the Apnea Hypopnea Index) cannot easily find fault with it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available