4.5 Article

Chiral separation using cyclodextrins as mobile phase additives in open-tubular liquid chromatography with a pseudophase coating

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 1195-1201

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100835

Keywords

chiral separation; cyclodextrins; open-tubular liquid chromatography; semipermanent coating; stationary pseudophase coating

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP180102810, 2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the successful chiral separation of various analytes using different cyclodextrins as mobile phase additives in open-tubular liquid chromatography with a stable coating. The method achieved high resolutions and low %RSD values.
The chiral separation of various analytes (dichlorprop, mecoprop, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen) was demonstrated with different cyclodextrins as mobile phase additives in open-tubular liquid chromatography using a stationary pseudophase semipermanent coating. The stable coating was prepared by a successive multiple ionic layer approach using poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), polystyrene sulfonate, and didodecyldimethyl ammonium bromide. Increasing concentrations (0-0.2 mM) of various native and derivatized cyclodextrins in 25 mM sodium tetraborate (pH 9.2) were investigated. Chiral separation was achieved for the four test analytes using 0.05-0.1 mM beta-cyclodextrin (resolution between 1.11 and 1.34), gamma-cyclodextrin (resolution between 0.78 and 1.27), carboxymethyl-beta-cyclodextrin (resolution between 1.64 and 2.59), and 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (resolution between 0.71 and 1.76) with the highest resolutions obtained with 0.1 mM carboxymethyl-beta-cyclodextrin. %RSD values were <10%. This is the first demonstration of chiral open-tubular liquid chromatography using achiral chromatographic coatings and cyclodextrins as mobile phase additives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available