4.3 Article

DNA strand break induction of aqueous plasmid DNA exposed to 30 MeV protons at ultra-high dose rate

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 255-260

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab114

Keywords

FLASH; proton; high dose rate; DNA strand breaks; plasmid DNA

Funding

  1. KAKENHI [JP 20H03634, JP 21H02874]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effects of ultra-high dose rate FLASH exposure on DNA strand break induction. By comparing the results of conventional dose rate and ultra-high dose rate exposure in plasmid DNA, it was found that FLASH exposure significantly reduced the induction of single strand breaks, but had no significant effect on double strand breaks.
Radiation cancer therapy with ultra-high dose rate exposure, so called FLASH radiotherapy, appears to reduce normal tissue damage without compromising tumor response. The aim of this study was to clarify whether FLASH exposure of proton beam would be effective in reducing the DNA strand break induction. We applied a simple model system, pBR322 plasmid DNA in aqueous 1 x TE solution, where DNA single strand breaks (SSBs) and double strand breaks (DSBs) can be precisely quantified by gel electrophoresis. Plasmid DNA were exposed to 27.5 MeV protons in the conventional dose rate of 0.05 Gy/s (CONV) and ultra-high dose rate of 40 Gy/s (FLASH). With both dose rate, the kinetics of the SSB and DSB induction were proportional to absorbed dose. The SSB induction of FLASH was significantly less than CONV, which were 8.79 +/- 0.14 (10(-3) SSB per Gy per molecule) and 10.8 +/- 0.68 (10(-3) SSB per Gy per molecule), respectively. The DSB induction of FLASH was also slightly less than CONV, but difference was not significant. Altogether, 27.5 MeV proton beam at 40 Gy/s reduced SSB and not DSB, thus its effect may not be significant in reducing lethal DNA damage that become apparent in acute radiation effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available