4.3 Article

Competition within the virus-specific CD4 T-cell pool limits the T follicular helper response after influenza infection

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages 729-740

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/icb.2016.42

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [5671222, APP1003131]
  2. NHMRC Project [1057707]
  3. NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship
  4. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship
  5. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1057707] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD4 T follicular helper cells (TFH) are critical in the generation of potent and long-lived B-cell responses after viral infection. However, the factors that dictate the generation and maintenance of these cells are not fully understood. Here we use adoptive transfer of OTII T-cell receptor transgenic CD4 T cells, followed by infection with recombinant influenza A virus (IAV), as a means of identifying and tracking virus-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses. We show that T-cell competition within the virus-specific CD4 T-cell pool induced by IAV infection limits the proliferation and differentiation of IAV-specific CD4(+) TFH responses. In particular, increased T-cell competition for antigen results in a diminished IAV-specific TFH CD4 T-cell responses, particularly germinal center TFH responses. Strikingly, competition in the form of preexisting cellular immunity generated by heterosubtypic IAV immunization limits de novo CD4 T-cell responses in secondary lymphoid tissue. Taken together, these data show a profound linkage between antigen availability and promotion of TFH CD4(+) T-cell responses in response to infection. These data suggest that competition within the CD4 T-cell pool limits TFH responses and may be an important regulatory mechanism for controlling immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available