4.8 Article

Comparative study of intrinsically safe zinc-nickel batteries and lead-acid batteries for energy storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 510, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230393

Keywords

Zinc-nickel battery; Lead-acid batteries; Solar power system; Hybrid electric vehicle; Economic

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Excellent Young Scholar [51722403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771134, U1601216]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar [18JCJQJC46500]
  4. Zhejiang Energy Group RAMP
  5. D Institute Co., Ltd.
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1601216]
  7. National Youth Talent Support Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed intrinsically safe zinc-nickel batteries (ZNB) with capacities of 20 Ah and 75 Ah, demonstrating superior performance compared to lead-acid batteries for electric vehicles and energy storage systems. ZNB shows more economic advantages under high discharge rates, highlighting its promising commercial application potential.
This work developed intrinsically safe zinc-nickel batteries (ZNB) with different capacities of 20 Ah and 75 Ah, respectively, for future fundamental studies and applications. The developed ZNB has much better rate performance and higher mass and volume energy density than those of LAB. The application of the ZNB stacks as a power supply of an electric bicycle and a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) is demonstrated. In addition, a solar power system and a 10 kWh ZNB energy storage system is built and tested to indicate the potential of ZNB in the application of energy storage devices. Interestingly, the ZNB has more economic advantages for the construction and operation of an energy storage system under high discharge rate. This work demonstrates the promising commercial application potential of ZNB and provides a new design methodology for energy storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available