4.3 Article

Silicon enhances production and quality of blueberry fruits (Vaccinium corymbosum L.)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 1563-1571

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2021.2014874

Keywords

Fruit crops; horticulture crops; nutrient models; vegetable crops

Categories

Funding

  1. CIAIMBITAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that adding silicon to the nutrient solution can enhance fruit growth of blueberry plants, with better results observed in coir fiber substrate. This could improve postharvest quality of blueberries.
The effect of silicon (Si) in the nutrient solution on the fruit development of 2-year-old blueberry plants (Vaccinium corymbosum L. cv. Ventura) was studied. Si was applied to the nutrient solution at a dose of 0.0, 0.6, and 1.2 mM. The parameters of fruit, stems and leaves growth, firmness, and biomass were measured. Fertigation in conjunction with traditional spread fertilization could improve the growth and yield of highbush blueberry to find the optimal method to control decay and prolong the quality of blueberries after harvest. The blueberry fruit has a light-blue appearance because its blue-black skin is covered with a waxy bloom. This layer is easily damaged or removed during fruit harvesting and postharvest handling. Si enhances the resistance of this layer to damage. A 2-year study was done to compare the effects of silicon fertigation and silicean sand and coir fiber as substrates on growth and availability of nutrients for blueberry plants during establishment of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. Bluecrop). The results of experiment indicated that the application of Si had better benefit on the fruit growth of blueberry plants in coir fiber, than the effect that was observed in the sand substrate. The results should improve our understanding for better preservation of postharvest quality of blueberry fruit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available