4.6 Review

Recent progress in zinc-based redox flow batteries: a review

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 55, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac4182

Keywords

Zn-based anolytes; catholytes; electrodes; membrane materials; redox flow batteries; large-scale energy storage

Funding

  1. 100 Talented Team of Hunan Province [XiangZu [2016] 91]
  2. 'Huxiang high-level talents' program [2018RS3077, 2019RS1046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes different types of zinc-based redox flow batteries (ZRFBs) according to their electrolyte environments, highlights the advances of key materials including electrode and membrane materials, and discusses the challenges and perspectives for the future development of high-performance ZRFBs.
Zinc-based redox flow batteries (ZRFBs) have been considered as ones of the most promising large-scale energy storage technologies owing to their low cost, high safety, and environmental friendliness. However, their commercial application is still hindered by a few key problems. First, the hydrogen evolution and zinc dendrite formation cause poor cycling life, of which needs to ameliorated or overcome by finding suitable anolytes. Second, the stability and energy density of catholytes are unsatisfactory due to oxidation, corrosion, and low electrolyte concentration. Meanwhile, highly catalytic electrode materials remain to be explored and the ion selectivity and cost efficiency of membrane materials demands further improvement. In this review, we summarize different types of ZRFBs according to their electrolyte environments including ZRFBs using neutral, acidic, and alkaline electrolytes, then highlight the advances of key materials including electrode and membrane materials for ZRFBs, and finally discuss the challenges and perspectives for the future development of high-performance ZRFBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available