4.6 Review

Structural insight into proteolytic activation and regulation of the complement system

Journal

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Volume 274, Issue 1, Pages 59-73

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12465

Keywords

complement; immune disorders; proteolytic cascade; structural biology

Categories

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation LUNA Nanomedicine Centre
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation through a Hallas-Moller Fellowship
  3. Danish Research Council for Nature and Universe
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2015-2666] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF14OC0012261] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. The Danish Cancer Society [R72-A4190] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complement system is a highly complex and carefully regulated proteolytic cascade activated through three different pathways depending on the activator recognized. The structural knowledge regarding the intricate proteolytic enzymes that activate and control complement has increased dramatically over the last decade. This development has been pivotal for understanding how mutations within complement proteins might contribute to pathogenesis and has spurred new strategies for development of complement therapeutics. Here we describe and discuss the complement system from a structural perspective and integrate the most recent findings obtained by crystallography, small-angle X-ray scattering, and electron microscopy. In particular, we focus on the proteolytic enzymes governing activation and their products carrying the biological effector functions. Additionally, we present the structural basis for some of the best known complement inhibitors. The large number of accumulated molecular structures enables us to visualize the relative size, position, and overall orientation of many of the most interesting complement proteins and assembled complexes on activator surfaces and in membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available