4.8 Article

Regularized Second-Order Moller-Plesset Theory: A More Accurate Alternative to Conventional MP2 for Noncovalent Interactions and Transition Metal Thermochemistry for the Same Computational Cost

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 50, Pages 12084-12097

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03468

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [F32GM142231]
  3. National Institutes of Health [5U01GM121667]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores three physically justified forms of single-parameter regularization for noncovalent interactions and transition metal thermochemistry, aiming to improve accuracy without increasing costs.
Second-order Moller-Plesset theory (MP2) notoriously breaks down for pi-driven dispersion interactions and dative bonds in transition metal complexes. Herein, we investigate three physically justified forms of single-parameter, energy-gap dependent regularization which can yield high and transferable accuracy for a variety of noncovalent interactions (including S22, S66, and L7 test sets) and (mostly closed shell) transition metal thermochemistry. Regularization serves to damp overestimated pairwise additive contributions, renormalizing first-order amplitudes such that the effects of higher-order correlations are incorporated. The optimal parameter values for the noncovalent and transition metal sets are 1.1, 0.7, and 0.4 for Kappa, Sigma, and Sigma 2 regularizers, respectively. However, such regularization slightly degrades the accuracy of conventional MP2 for some small-molecule test sets, most of which have relatively large average frontier energy gaps. Our results suggest that appropriately regularized MP2 models may improve double hybrid density functionals, at no additional cost over conventional MP2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available