4.6 Article

Understanding the Olefin Polymerization Initiation Mechanism by Cr(III)/SiO2 Using the Activation Strain Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages 296-308

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09753

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Universidad de Medellin
  2. European Social Fund [RyC-2016-19930]
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Innovacion y Universidades [PGC2018-100818-A-I00]
  4. Spanish MEC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Cr(III) sites with higher strain are less active, and ethylene insertion into the Cr-O bond is more favorable than C-H bond activation for ethylene polymerization initiation. Activation energies for both initiation mechanisms are controlled by both interaction and strain energies.
In this work, we computationally analyze the effect of the strain at the Cr(III) sites of a Cr(III)/SiO2 catalyst in the ethylene polymerization initiation considering two possible pathways: ethylene C-H activation and ethylene insertion into the Cr-O bond. We use the activation strain model (ASM), which dissects the activation energy of a reaction into strain and interaction energies, on a series of Cr(III) clusters with different sizes of the Si-O-Si rings. Our results indicate that more strained Cr(III) sites are more active than less strained ones and that the ethylene insertion into the Cr-O bond is more favorable than C-H bond activation for all sites. The ASM analysis reveals that the activation energies of both initiation mechanisms are dually controlled by interaction and strain energies. However, the comparison of the two mechanisms indicates that the preference for the ethylene insertion pathway is due to lower distortion of the ethylene fragment at the transition states, which is ultimately controlled by one intermolecular and one intramolecular interaction between the activated ethylene and the Cr(III) site fragments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available