4.6 Article

Why Does a B12H12 Icosahedron Need Two Electrons to be Stable: A First-Principles Electron-Correlated Investigation of B12Hn (n=6, 12) Clusters

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 125, Issue 51, Pages 10734-10741

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c09167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, large-scale electron-correlated computations were performed on B12H12 and B12H6 clusters to understand the high stability of dianion icosahedron and specific geometries. This research found that dianion B12H12 and certain geometric structures exhibit high stability.
In this work, we present large-scale electron-correlated computations on various conformers of B12H12 and B12H6 clusters to understand the reasons behind the high stability of dianion icosahedron (I-h) and cage-like B12H6 geometries. Although the B-12 icosahedron is the basic building block in some structures of bulk boron, it is unstable in its free form. Furthermore, its H-passivated entity, i.e., a B12H12 icosahedron, is also unstable in the free form. However, dianion B12H12 has been predicted to be stable as a perfect icosahedron in the free-standing form. To capture the correct picture for the stability of B12H122- and B12H6 clusters, we optimized these structures by employing the coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) approach and the cc-pVDZ basis set. We also performed the vibrational frequency analysis of the isomers of these clusters using the same level of theory to ensure the stability of the structures. For all of the stable geometries obtained from the vibrational frequency analysis, we additionally computed their optical absorption spectra using the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) approach at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory. Our calculated absorption spectra could be probed in future experiments on these clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available