4.6 Article

Performance of Vibrational Self-Consistent Field Theory for Accurate Potential Energy Surfaces: Fundamentals, Excited States, and Intensities

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages 608-622

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c09989

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DST-SERB-EMR [EMR/2017/000512, CUJ/Acad/Proj-PHY/2017/97]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the performance of vibrational structure calculations beyond the harmonic approximation using the vibrational self-consistent field method with second-order perturbation corrections (VSCF-PT2) and accurate potential energy surfaces (PESs) obtained from various coupled-cluster electronic structure theories. The accuracy of anharmonic calculations depends on the electronic structure theory used, with CCSD and CCSD(T) showing promising results. The results suggest that VSCF-PT2 theory computed at the CCSD(T) potential offers a good cost/accuracy ratio.
The performance of vibrational structure calculations beyond harmonic approximation in the framework of the vibrational self-consistent field method with second-order perturbation corrections (VSCF-PT2) is investigated in conjunction with very accurate potential energy surfaces (PESs) given by various coupled-cluster electronic structure theories. The quality of anharmonic calculations depends on the accuracy of the underlying multidimensional PES obtained from its functional form, which is given by the level of electronic structure theory. Two such highest levels of typical coupled-cluster electronic structure methods, CCSD and the gold standard CCSD(T), along with their variants such as CCD, CR-CCL (completely renormalized CR-CC(2,3) approach), and CCSD(TQ) are tested for the construction of accurate anharmonic potentials without any fitting or ad hoc scaling and using ccpVTZ basis sets. The accuracy of VSCF-PT2 theory in comparison to experimental values is tested for a series of 16 molecules with 135 fundamental bands, 64 overtones, and combination bands and also for 39 intensities. It is found that CCD and CCSD bind the potential tighter than CCSD(T) and the computed VSCF-PT2 transitions are more blue-shifted showing higher deviation from the experiment. In general, VSCF-PT2 results computed at the CCSD(T) potential offer a good cost/accuracy ratio, with the mean absolute deviation and the mean absolute percentage error with the experiment being similar to 16 cm(-1) and 1.38, respectively, for fundamentals. Additionally, while the CR-CCL and CCSD(TQ) methods offer similar levels of accuracies as compared to CCSD(T), the former offers a better accuracy/cost ratio than the latter and is a suitable alternative to CCSD(T).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available