4.7 Article

Computer-extracted features of nuclear morphology in hematoxylin and eosin images distinguish stage II and IV colon tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 257, Issue 1, Pages 17-28

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/path.5864

Keywords

computational pathology; quantitative histomorphometric image analysis; colon cancer; hematogenous spread; peritoneal spread

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institutes, USA [1U24CA199374-01, R01CA249992-01A1, R01CA202752-01A1, R01CA208236-01A1, R01CA216579-01A1, R01CA220581-01A1, R01CA257612-01A1, 1U01CA239055-01, 1U01CA248226-01, 1U54CA254566-01, 2P50CA150964-06A1, R01CA196643-01]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1R01HL15127701A1]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [1R43EB028736-01]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [1 C06 RR12463-01]
  5. United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [IBX004121A]
  6. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Breast Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-19-1-0668]
  7. Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-15-1-0558, W81XWH-20-1-0851]
  8. Lung Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-18-1-0440, W81XWH-20-1-0595]
  9. Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-18-1-0404]
  10. Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) Glue Grant
  11. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund
  12. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR0002548]
  13. NIH roadmap for Medical Research
  14. Bristol Myers Squibb
  15. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  16. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the utility of quantitative features of colon cancer nuclei in distinguishing between stage II and stage IV colon cancers using digitized whole slide images. The researchers trained deep learning models and a random forest classifier to identify stage-specific features and successfully applied them for risk stratification and prognosis assessment.
We assessed the utility of quantitative features of colon cancer nuclei, extracted from digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs), to distinguish between stage II and stage IV colon cancers. Our discovery cohort comprised 100 stage II and stage IV colon cancer cases sourced from the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC). We performed initial (independent) model validation on 51 (143) stage II and 79 (54) stage IV colon cancer cases from UHCMC (The Cancer Genome Atlas's Colon Adenocarcinoma, TCGA-COAD, cohort). Our approach comprised the following steps: (1) a fully convolutional deep neural network with VGG-18 architecture was trained to locate cancer on WSIs; (2) another deep-learning model based on Mask-RCNN with Resnet-50 architecture was used to segment all nuclei from within the identified cancer region; (3) a total of 26 641 quantitative morphometric features pertaining to nuclear shape, size, and texture were extracted from within and outside tumor nuclei; (4) a random forest classifier was trained to distinguish between stage II and stage IV colon cancers using the five most discriminatory features selected by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Our trained classifier using these top five features yielded an AUC of 0.81 and 0.78, respectively, on the held-out cases in the UHCMC and TCGA validation sets. For 197 TCGA-COAD cases, the Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 2.20 (95% CI 1.24-3.88) with a concordance index of 0.71, using only the top five features for risk stratification of overall survival. The Kaplan-Meier estimate also showed statistically significant separation between the low-risk and high-risk patients, with a log-rank P value of 0.0097. Finally, unsupervised clustering of the top five features revealed that stage IV colon cancers with peritoneal spread were morphologically more similar to stage II colon cancers with no long-term metastases than to stage IV colon cancers with hematogenous spread. (c) 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available