4.5 Article

Only I Know Now, of Course, How to Deal With it, or Better to Deal With it: A Mixed Methods Phase II Study of a Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention for the Management of Episodic Breathlessness

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 758-768

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.11.003

Keywords

Non-pharmacological; episodic breathlessness; cognitive-behavioral intervention; dyspnea; palliative care; breathlessness; pilot study; single-arm phase II study

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GY1716]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a brief cognitive and behavioral intervention for the management of episodic breathlessness. The intervention and study procedures were found to be feasible, safe, and well accepted by patients. Patients showed improved mastery of breathlessness after the intervention.
Context. Episodic breathlessness is characterized by increased breathlessness intensity, and it is burdensome for patients. A vicious cycle of breathlessness-anxiety/panic-breathlessness leads to emergencies that can rarely be alleviated by drugs. Nonpharmacological interventions seem to be beneficial: Can a brief cognitive and behavioral intervention help patients to better manage episodic breathlessness? Objectives. To evaluate the feasibility, safety, acceptability, and potential effects of a brief cognitive and behavioral intervention for the management of episodic breathlessness. Methods. Between February 2019 and February 2020, 49 patients with life-limiting diseases suffering from episodic breathlessness were enrolled in the single-arm phase II study. The baseline assessment was followed by the one- to two-hour intervention. In weeks two, four, and six after the intervention, the outcomes (main outcome of potential effects: mastery of breathlessness) were assessed, and in week six, a qualitative interview, and the final assessment took place. A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate mainly the feasibility, including interviewing informal carers. Results. 46/49 patients (24 female; 36 with COPD; mean age: 66.0 years) participated in the baseline assessment, 38 attended the intervention, 32 completed the final assessment, and 22 were interviewed. Study procedures and the intervention were feasible and mainly well accepted and patients did not experience burdens caused by it (28/32). In the interviews, patients described a positive change in their competencies in managing episodic breathlessness and feelings of anxiety during the episode. Mastery of breathlessness improved after the intervention. Conclusion. The brief cognitive and behavioral intervention and the study procedures are feasible, safe, and well accepted. We can describe a change for better management of episodic breathlessness in patients after the intervention, still, this needs to be evaluated in a Phase III trial for inclusion in the management of episodic breathlessness. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available