4.4 Article

Central giant cell granulomas of the jaws stromal cells harbour mutations and have osteogenic differentiation capacity, in vivo and in vitro

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 206-216

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13274

Keywords

bone tumour; genetics; mutations; osteogenesis; patient-derived xenograft

Funding

  1. CNPq, Brazil
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Brazil
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/PNPD grant) [88887.469369/2019-00]
  4. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the mutational status of mononuclear cells and giant cells in CGCG, as well as the osteogenic potential of stromal cells. The results confirm that the signature mutations are restricted to stromal cells in CGCG, and these cells have the capacity to differentiate into osteoblasts.
Background Central giant cell granulomas (CGCG) of the jaws are osteolytic lesions that may behave aggressively and respond poorly to surgery. Microscopically, in addition to giant cells, there is a mononuclear cell population composed of macrophage/monocytic cells and spindle-shaped cells of mesenchymal origin. Seventy two percent of these tumours harbour mutually exclusive TRPV4, KRAS and FGFR1 mutations. We aimed to assess the mutational status of mononuclear and giant cells and the osteogenic potential of stromal cells in vitro and in vivo. Methods and Results We screened CGCG for signature mutations and used laser-capture microdissection to demonstrate that the mutations are restricted to the mononuclear cells. Additionally, we established CGCG primary cell culture and observed that the cells retained the mutations throughout passages. By flow cytometry, we observed predominance of CD14(-)CD51(-)CD61(-) cells, consistent with the expected profile for stromal cells. Considering the mesenchymal origin of stromal cells, we assessed the osteogenic differentiation potential of CGCG cells in culture by cytochemistry (von Kossa and alizarin red staining), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay and gene expression of osteogenic markers. CGCG cells presented self-capacity to increase ALP levels in a time-dependent manner and under osteogenic induction presented increasing number of calcium deposits, and overall higher expression of osteocalcin, RUNX2, ALPL and osteopontin than cells without osteogenic induction. A patient-derived xenograft model for CGCG was established, and osteoid material deposition was observed. Conclusion Collectively, the results confirm that the signature mutations are restricted to stromal cells in CGCG, and the in vitro and in vivo results support that these cells have the capacity to differentiate into osteoblasts, in line with the bone formation often observed in the stroma of these lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available