Journal
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 147-152Publisher
SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-022-1728-5
Keywords
Communication; community dwelling; disability studies; older adults; social interaction
Categories
Funding
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG) [27-22]
- [26242059]
- [21J01605]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This observational prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between the incidence of disability and non-face-to-face interactions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan. The study found that individuals with face-to-face interactions or only one kind of interaction had a lower incidence of disability compared to those with no interactions. Therefore, clinicians may achieve better outcomes in disease prevention by considering the interaction status of older adults in their day-to-day practice and encouraging them to engage in any form of interaction, including non-face-to-face interactions.
Objectives This observational prospective cohort study, conducted between September 2015 and February 2019, aimed to investigate the association between the incidence of disability and non-face-to-face interactions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan. Design Participants reported their interaction status using a self-report questionnaire. Face-to-face interactions comprised in-person meetings, while virtual interactions (e.g., via phone calls or emails) were defined as non-face-to-face interactions. We examined the relationship between their interaction status at baseline and the risk of disability incidence at follow-up. We also considered several potential confounding variables, such as demographic characteristics. Setting The National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Study of Geriatric Syndromes. Participants We included 1159 adults from Takahama City aged >= 75 years (mean age +/- standard deviation = 79.5 +/- 3.6 years). Measurements Interaction status was assessed using a self-reported questionnaire consisting of two sections (face-to-face and non-face-to-face interactions), and four questionnaire items. Based on the responses we categorized study participants into four groups: both interactions, face-to-face only, non-face-to-face only, and no interactions. Results Individuals with both kinds of interactions (49.3/1000 person-years) or only one kind of interaction (face-to-face = 57.7/1000 person-years; non-face-to-face = 41.2 person-years) had lower incidence of disability than those with no interactions (88.9/1000 person-years). Moreover, the hazard ratios adjusted for potential confounding factors for the incidence of disability in the both interaction, face-to-face-only, and non-face-to-face only groups were 0.57 (confidence interval = 0.39-0.82; p = 0.003), 0.66 (confidence interval = 0.44-0.98; p = 0.038), and 0.47 (confidence interval = 0.22-0.99; p = 0.048), respectively. Conclusion Considering the interaction status of older adults in their day-to-day practice, clinicians may be able to achieve better outcomes in the primary prevention of disease by encouraging older adults to engage in any form of interaction, including non-face-to-face interactions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available