4.6 Article

The VitMin Lab Sandwich-ELISA Assays for Iron and Inflammation Markers Compared Well with Clinical Analyzer Reference-Type Assays in Subsamples of the Nepal National Micronutrient Status Survey

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages 350-359

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab355

Keywords

micronutrients; iron deficiency; inflammation; ferritin; soluble transferrin receptor; C-reactive protein; alpha-1-acid glycoprotein

Funding

  1. UNICEF
  2. European Union
  3. Nepal Ministry of Health and Population
  4. CDC
  5. United States Agency for International Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using samples from the Nepal survey, the VitMin ELISA assays produced mostly comparable results to the Roche reference-type assays for Fer, CRP and AGP. However, the lack of standardization in sTfR assays led to a significant systematic difference.
Background: The low cost and small specimen volume of the VitMin Lab ELISA assays for serum ferritin (Fer), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) have allowed their application to micronutrient surveys conducted in low-resource countries for similar to 2 decades. Objectives: We conducted a comparison between the ELISA and reference-type assays used in the US NHANES. Methods: Using the Roche clinical analyzer as a reference, we measured random subsets of the 2016 Nepal National Micronutrient Status Survey (200 serum samples from children aged 6-59 mo; 100 serum samples from nonpregnant women) for Fer, sTfR, CRP and AGP. We compared the combined data sets with the ELISA survey results using descriptive analyses. Results: The Lin's concordance coefficients between the 2 assays were >= 0.89 except for sTfR (Lin's rho = 0.58). The median relative difference to the reference was as follows: Fer, -8.5%; sTfR, 71.2%; CRP -19.5%; and AGP -8.2%. The percentage of VitMin samples agreeing within +/- 30% of the reference was as follows: Fer, 88.5%; sTfR, 1.70%; CRP 74.9%; and AGP 92.9%. The prevalence of abnormal results was comparable between the 2 assays for Fer, CRP and AGP, and for sTfR after adjusting to the Roche assay. Continued biannual performance (2007-2019) of the VitMin assays in CDC's external quality assessment program (6 samples/y) demonstrated generally acceptable performance. Conclusions: Using samples from the Nepal survey, the VitMin ELISA assays produced mostly comparable results to the Roche reference-type assays for Fer, CRP and AGP. The lack of sTfR assay standardization to a common reference material explains the large systematic difference observed for sTfR, which could be corrected by an adjustment equation pending further validation. This snapshot comparison together with the long-term external quality assessment links the survey data generated by the VitMin Lab to the Roche assays used in NHANES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available