4.7 Article

Post-irradiation microstructural examination of EUROFER-ODS steel irradiated at 300 °C and 400 °C

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 557, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153259

Keywords

EUROFER-ODS; Neutron irradiation; Dislocation loops; Burgers vector; TEM; ODS

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme [633053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed the microstructure of EUROFER-ODS alloy with 0.5% Y2O3 under neutron irradiation using transmission electron microscopy. It found that small loops and point defects are preferentially located near structural defects, and the distribution of loops depends on the size and number density of the particles.
The effect of neutron irradiation on the microstructure of EUROFER-ODS alloy reinforced with an addition of 0.5% Y2O3 was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. The irradiation of up to 16.2 dpa damage dose at 300 degrees C and 400 degrees C was performed in Petten High Flux Reactor. This study focuses on the imaging, identification, and quantitative analysis of interstitial loops and voids located on ODS particles. The nano-sized loops and point defects with b1/2 111 Burgers vectors are preferentially located near structural defects such as the line dislocations or impurities in the material irradiated at 300 degrees C. Homogeneously distributed loops having Burgers vectors of b(1/2) < 111 > and b < 100 > types were found in the material irradiated at 400 degrees C. The obtained quantitative data on radiation-induced defects such as size, number density and relaxation volume were compared with EUROFER97 irradiated at the same conditions. It was found that the occurrence of radiation induced defects depends on the local number density and the size distribution of the ODS particles and not only on the irradiation damage and temperature. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available