4.7 Article

Morphological and chemical characterization of uranium and cerium nuclear forensics samples

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 555, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153109

Keywords

Nuclear forensics; Metallic uranium; metallic cerium; Surface morphology; Uranium Isotopic Composition; CMX6

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the nuclear forensics material characterization conducted in the Israeli National Nuclear Forensic Laboratory during an international exercise. The study focused on characterizing physical parameters, elemental and isotopic composition, morphology, and chemical composition of uranium and cerium metal ingots. By analyzing the samples, a connection between different materials was identified, such as between ES-1 and ES-2, and comparisons were made with theoretical samples. The conclusion of the study was that ES1 and ES2 were suggestively connected to their theoretical sources based on isotopic ratio.
The objective of this paper is to describe nuclear forensics material characterization, as conducted in the Israeli National Nuclear Forensic Laboratory (INNFL) during an international exercise Collaborative Material Exercise 6 (CMX6) organized by the Nuclear Forensics international technical working group (ITWG). The characterized materials are uranium and cerium metal ingots. The goal was characterization of physical parameters, elemental and isotopic composition, morphology and chemical composition of the surface. Electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy techniques were combined for morphological, structural and elemental study of the surface. The information from these analyses was used to answer the exercise questions, comparing the materials (labeled ES-1 and ES-2) to each other and to other samples described in the scenario. The INNFL investigation identified a connection between ES-1 and ES-2 based on several indicators, including the isotopic composition of the uranium present in both samples, as well as other surface contaminations, mainly yttria and graphite. Based on these finding the INNFL established a connection between ES-1 and ES-2 to ES-3B (theoretical sample with uranium traces) and has not established a connection to ES-3A (theoretical sample of plutonium powder). ES1 and ES-2 have been suggestively connected to their theoretical source, by their isotopic ratio. The INNFL conclusion was that the theoretical source materials (oxide and fluoride) were converted into the actual materials. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available