Decoupling countermands nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping

Response inhibition is essential for goal-directed behavior within dynamic environments. Selective stopping is a complex form of response inhibition where only part of a multieffector response must be cancelled. A substantial response delay emerges on unstopped effectors when a cued effector is successfully stopped. This stopping-interference effect is indicative of nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping, which may, in part, be a consequence of functional coupling. The present study exam-ined selective stopping of (de)coupled bimanual responses in healthy human participants of either sex. Participants performed synchro-nous and asynchronous versions of an anticipatory stop-signal paradigm across two sessions while mu (m) and beta (13) rhythms were measured with electroencephalography. Results showed that responses were behaviorally decoupled during asynchronous go trials and the extent of response asynchrony was associated with lateralized sensorimotor m- and 13-desynchronization during response preparation. Selective stopping produced a stopping-interference effect and was marked by a nonselective increase and subsequent rebound in prefrontal and sensorimotor 13. In support of the coupling account, stopping-interference was smaller during selective stop-ping of asynchronous responses and negatively associated with the magnitude of decoupling. However, the increase in sensorimotor 13 during selective stopping was equivalent between the stopped and unstopped hand irrespective of response synchrony. Overall, the findings demonstrate that decoupling facilitates selective stopping after a global pause process and emphasizes the importance of con-sidering the influence of both the go and stop context when investigating response inhibition. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Humans rely on their ability to stop preplanned or ongoing movements. The present study identified neural signatures of response preparation and inhibition from electroencephalography during selective stopping of coupled and decoupled bimanual responses. Stopping was more selective for decoupled compared with coupled responses and supported by lateralization of sensorimotor mu and beta power during response preparation. These findings demonstrate that decoupling may have functional significance for understanding cognitive control in the form of selective stopping.

Automated summary

This study identified neural signatures of response preparation and inhibition during selective stopping of coupled and decoupled bimanual responses. Stopping was more selective for decoupled responses and supported by lateralized sensorimotor mu and beta power during response preparation. These findings provide valuable insights into the functional significance of decoupling for cognitive control in the form of selective stopping.