4.6 Article

Composite endpoint for ALS clinical trials based on patient preference: Patient-Ranked Order of Function (PROOF)

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 539-546

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328194

Keywords

ALS; motor neuron disease; randomised trials

Funding

  1. Dutch Research Council [452019301]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research [5UL1TR003142-03, 5R01HL08977810, 3P30CA12443512]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ALS patients have diverse preferences and needs, leading to the development of a new endpoint (PROOF) that focuses on patient function improvement. It provides a patient-centered analysis to refine risk-benefit assessment of new treatments for ALS.
Background Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) show considerable variation in symptoms. Treatments targeting an overall improvement in symptomatology may not address what the majority of patients consider to be most important. Here, we propose a composite endpoint for ALS clinical trials that weighs the improvement in symptoms compared with what the patient population actually wants. Methods An online questionnaire was sent out to a population-based registry in The Netherlands. Patients with ALS were asked to score functional domains with a validated self-reported questionnaire, and rank the order of importance of each domain. This information was used to estimate variability in patient preferences and to develop the Patient-Ranked Order of Function (PROOF) endpoint. Results There was extensive variability in patient preferences among the 433 responders. The majority of the patients (62.1%) preferred to prioritise certain symptoms over others when evaluating treatments. The PROOF endpoint was established by comparing each patient in the treatment arm to each patient in the placebo arm, based on their preferred order of functional domains. PROOF averages all pairwise comparisons, and reflects the probability that a patient receiving treatment has a better outcome on domains that are most important to them, compared with a patient receiving placebo. By means of simulation we illustrate how incorporating patient preference may upgrade or downgrade trial results. Conclusions The PROOF endpoint provides a balanced patient-focused analysis of the improvement in function and may help to refine the risk-benefit assessment of new treatments for ALS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available