4.7 Article

NFL during acute spinal cord lesions in MS: a hurdle for the detection of inflammatory activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 269, Issue 7, Pages 3495-3500

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10926-7

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; NFL; Spinal cord; Gadolinium-enhancing lesion

Funding

  1. Health Institute Carlos III [PI20/01446]
  2. FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study confirms the value of NFL levels in monitoring asymptomatic inflammatory activity in the brain caused by GEL, but NFL concentration is not as useful when inflammation occurs only in the spinal cord.
Introduction Levels of neuro-filament light chain (NFL) correlate with clinical and radiological activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and have been used as a surrogate biomarker of axonal destruction related to inflammatory activity. The main objective of this work is to explore the specific contribution of acute inflammation within the spinal cord to the elevation of NFL levels. Patients and methods MS patients with a baseline study of NFL at diagnosis of the disease and a brain and spinal cord MRI scan were selected. Patients were classified according to the presence, number and location of gadolinium enhancing lesion (GEL) and the relationship between NFL levels and both brain and spinal cord GEL were explored. Results Seventy-seven patients were selected. NFL levels were significantly higher in patients with only one GEL restricted to the brain than those without GEL (1702 pg/ml vs 722.7 pg/mL, p = 0.03) and correlated with number. However, no differences were seen among patients with GEL limited to the spinal cord and those without GEL (735.2 pg/ml vs 722.7 pg/mL). Conclusion Our study reaffirms the value of NFL levels in monitoring asymptomatic inflammatory activity in the brain measured by GEL. However, NFL concentration is not as useful when only inflammatory activity occurs in the spinal cord.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available