4.3 Article

Oral D-mannose treatment suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis via induction of regulatory T cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
Volume 362, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577778

Keywords

D-mannose; Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; Multiple sclerosis; Regulatory T cells

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [PP-1812-33060]
  2. National Institutes of Health T32 training grant (NIAID) [T32AI134646]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

D-mannose supplementation attenuates pathology in diabetes and airway inflammation models by modifying cellular energy metabolism and inducing T regulatory cells. In experiments on EAE, it delayed disease onset, reduced severity, and prevented relapses, suggesting potential as a complementary therapy for MS.
D-mannose (D-m) is a glucose epimer found in natural products, especially fruits. In mouse models of diabetes and airway inflammation, D-m supplementation via drinking water attenuated pathology by modifying cellular energy metabolism, leading to the activation of latent transforming growth factor beta (TGF-13), which in turn induced T regulatory cells (Tregs). Given that Tregs are important in controlling neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and likely in multiple sclerosis (MS), we hypothesized that D-m could also suppress EAE. We found that D-m delayed disease onset and reduced disease severity in two models of EAE. Importantly, D-m treatment prevented relapses in a relapsing-remitting model of EAE, which mimics the most common clinical manifestation of MS. EAE suppression was accompanied by increased frequency of CD4+FoxP3+ Tregs in the central nervous system, suggesting that EAE suppression resulted from Treg cell induction by D-m. These findings suggest that D-m has the potential to be a safe and low-cost complementary therapy for MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available