4.5 Review

Proteostasis deregulation as a driver of C9ORF72 pathogenesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 159, Issue 6, Pages 941-957

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15529

Keywords

ALS; C9ORF72; ER stress; FTD; ISR; proteostasis; UPR

Funding

  1. Millennium Institute [P09-015-F]
  2. European Commission [MSCA-RISE 734749]
  3. Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigacion en Areas Prioritarias [15150012]
  4. US Office of Naval Research-Global [N62909-16-1-2003]
  5. Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [D11E1007, ID16I10223]
  6. Muscular Dystrophy Association [382453]
  7. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-16-1-0384]
  8. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [1140549, 3180195]
  9. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo [21161332]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the C9ORF72 gene and dysregulation of proteostasis are major factors leading to the development of ALS and FTD, involving processes such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, nuclear transport, and autophagy.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are two related neurodegenerative disorders that display overlapping features. The hexanucleotide repeat expansion GGGGCC (G(4)C(2)) in C9ORF72 gene has been causally linked to both ALS and FTD emergence, thus opening a novel potential therapeutic target for disease intervention. The main driver of C9ORF72 pathology is the disruption of distinct cellular processes involved in the function of the proteostasis network. Here we discuss main findings relating to the induction of neurodegeneration by C9ORF72 mutation and proteostasis deregulation, highlighting the role of the endoplasmic reticulum stress, nuclear transport, and autophagy in the disease process. We further discuss possible points of intervention to target proteostasis mediators to treat C9ORF72-linked ALS/FTD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available