4.5 Review

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue 2, Pages 265-321

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03876-7

Keywords

Progressive glioblastoma; Guidelines update; Targeted therapy; Immunotherapy

Funding

  1. Congress of Neurological Surgery
  2. American Association of Neurological Surgeons
  3. Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recommendations provided apply to adults with progressive GBM who have undergone standard primary treatment, suggesting the use of bevacizumab for improved disease control. There is insufficient evidence to support the benefit or harm of combining bevacizumab with cytotoxic or targeted therapies in progressive glioblastoma.
The following questions and recommendations are pertinent to the following: Target population These recommendations apply to adults with progressive GBM who have undergone standard primary treatment with surgery and/or chemoradiation. Question 1 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation Level III: Treatment with bevacizumab is suggested in the treatment of progressive GBM, as it provides improved disease control compared to historical controls as measured by best imaging response and progression free survival at 6 months, while not providing evidence for improvement in overall survival. Question 2 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as combination therapy with cytotoxic agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation Level III: There is insufficient evidence to show benefit or harm of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic therapies in progressive glioblastoma due to a lack of evidence supporting a clearly defined benefit without significant toxicity. Question 3 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as a combination therapy with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. Question 4 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. Question 5 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents in combination with cytotoxic therapies superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. Question 6 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. Question 7 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. Question 8 In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with bevacizumab superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available