4.7 Article

Performance analysis of spatially distributed LTE-U/NR-U and Wi-Fi networks: An analytical model for coexistence study

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103157

Keywords

Wi-Fi; LTE-U; NR-U; CSAT; LBT; Inter-RAT coexistence; Performance analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the coexistence of Wi-Fi and LTE-U in spatially distributed scenarios, proposing an analytical model for evaluating their throughput and validating the model's reliability through simulations and experiments.
To access an unlicensed channel, Wi-Fi follows the Listen Before Talk (LBT) mechanism, whereas LTE-U (and future New Radio in Unlicensed (NR-U) Patriciello et al., 2020; Lagen et al., 2019) adopts the ON-OFF duty cycled mechanism to fairly share the channel with Wi-Fi. These different mechanisms result in quite different performance for Wi-Fi and LTE-U/NR-U based on their relative deployment and density in the environment. In this work, we present an analytical model for the characterization of achievable throughputs of Wi-Fi and LTE-U networks in spatially distributed scenarios with downlink-prevalent traffic. The proposed model is used to study how LTE-U and Wi-Fi coexist with each other in spatially distributed scenarios. Our extensive simulation results show that it is a reliable model for estimating the throughput of both Wi-Fi and LTE-U in a spatially distributed deployment. The impact of various network parameters such as energy detection and carrier sense threshold on Wi-Fi and LTE-U coexistence is explored as a byproduct and corroborated via a National Instrument experimental test bed. Our model gives very high accuracy in throughput estimation and the mean normalized error is less than 3% for a 80-node scenario in which 50% of nodes belong to each of Wi-Fi and LTE-U network. The analytical model is also used to conduct coexistence studies of LTE-U and Wi-Fi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available