4.7 Article

Dereplication of Fungal Metabolites by NMR-Based Compound Networking Using MADByTE

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 614-624

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00841

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health through National Cancer Institute [P01 CA125066, R15 CA246491]
  2. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
  3. Office of Dietary Supplements [U41 AT008718, F31 AT010098]
  4. NSERC Discovery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the performance of MADByTE for compound dereplication and found that MADByTE is effective for detecting specific compound classes in complex mixtures and can successfully predict compound members in the sample set.
Strategies for natural product dereplication are continually evolving, essentially in lock step with advances in MS and NMR techniques. MADByTE is a new platform designed to identify common structural features between samples in complex extract libraries using two-dimensional NMR spectra. This study evaluated the performance of MADByTE for compound dereplication by examining two classes of fungal metabolites, the resorcylic acid lactones (RALs) and spirobisnaphthalenes. First, a pure compound database was created using the HSQC and TOCSY data from 19 RALs and 10 spirobisnaphthalenes. Second, this database was used to assess the accuracy of compound class clustering through the generation of a spin system feature network. Seven fungal extracts were dereplicated using this approach, leading to the correct prediction of members of both families from the extract set. Finally, NMR-guided isolation led to the discovery of three new palmarumycins (20-22). Together these results demonstrate that MADByTE is effective for the detection of specific compound classes in complex mixtures and that this detection is possible for both known and new natural products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available