4.4 Article

Long-bonding and bonding nature in noble gas insertion compounds MNgBY of transition metal-boron bond

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-021-04970-3

Keywords

Noble gas; Transition metal; Boron; Bonding nature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the effects of transition metals and substituents on inert gas inserted compounds through orbital analysis and electron density analysis, finding that bonds in Au compounds are shorter and stronger than those in Ag/Cu compounds. The properties of M-Ng and Ng-B bonds are mainly influenced by bond lengths rather than substituents.
The nature of inert gas bonding has always been an important topic. The bonds of noble gases cover the entire range of chemical bonds, from the weakest van der Waals forces, to non-covalent interactions, and to covalent bonds. Two types of methods were used to investigate the properties of chemical bonds in the inert gas inserted compound MNgBY with the transition metal M = Cu/Ag/Au and substituents Y = O/S/NH, one based on orbital analysis and the other based on electron density analysis. The NBO/NRT analysis shows that in these compounds there exists long-bonding striding the noble gas between the transitional metal and boron, similar to the noble gas insertion compounds HNgX of hydrohalide, and so a three-center four-electron bond exists among the M-Ng-B part. The electron density analyses show that the M-Ng bond between the metal Cu/Ag/Au and noble gas and the Ng-B bond in the Cu/Ag compounds are partial covalent but the Ng-B bond in Au compounds is a typical covalent bond. The large relativistic effects of Au cause the bonds in Au compounds shorter and stronger than the bonds in Ag/Cu compounds. The properties of the M-Ng and Ng-B bonds are not affected by substituents Y, but the bond lengths are sensitive to substituents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available