4.3 Article

First visualisation of bacterial biofilms in 3D porous media with neutron microtomography without contrast agent

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY
Volume 285, Issue 1, Pages 20-28

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13063

Keywords

Neutron tomography; X-ray tomography; biofilm; 3D porous media

Categories

Funding

  1. Universite Grenoble Alpes through the IRS Project 'Neutron tomography as a novel tool for imaging bacterial biofilms inside 3D porous media'
  2. ILL. 3SR is part of LabEx Tec [21 -ANR11-LABX-0030]
  3. Institut Carnot PolyNat [ANR16CARN-0025]
  4. 'COGITO' Hubert-Curien Partnership (Campus France) [42815QE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Characterizing bacterial biofilm growth in porous media is essential for biofouling research, and X-ray microtomography has been a useful tool. However, concerns over contrast agent use have led researchers to explore neutron tomography as an alternative imaging method. Results showed that neutron tomography provided consistent biofilm distribution observations with X-ray microtomography, but the images were too noisy for quantitative measurements.
Characterising bacterial biofilm growth in porous media is important for developing reliable numerical models of biofouling in industrial biofilters. One of the promising imaging methods to do that has been a recent successful application of X-ray microtomography. However, this technique requires a contrast agent (1-chloronaphtalene, for example) to distinguish biofilm from the liquid phase, which raises concern about biofilm disruption and impaired image interpretation. To overcome these drawbacks, we tested a new approach based on neutron tomography (NT), which does not need a contrast agent, by imaging two types of porous media (polytetrafluoroethylene - PTFE - and clay beads of various diameters) in glass or PTFE tubes in which bacterial biofilms were grown for 7 days and by comparing these images with the ones obtained with X-ray microtomography. NT images showed that the biofilm formed preferentially around the beads and at bead/bead interface. Visual comparison of both imaging techniques showed consistent biofilm spatial distributions and that the contrasting agent did not significantly disrupt the biofilm. NT images, on the other hand, were still too noisy to allow quantitative measurements. Therefore, X-ray microtomography (provided it uses non-disruptive contrast agents) seems to provide more reliable microstructural descriptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available