4.5 Article

Optimal allocation of battery energy storage systems in distribution networks with high wind power penetration

Journal

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 1105-1113

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0542

Keywords

battery storage plants; wind power plants; power distribution planning; Monte Carlo methods; stochastic programming; evolutionary computation; battery energy storage systems; BESS; distribution networks; wind power penetration; renewable power generation intermittencies; stochastic planning; wind power utilisation; wind power uncertainties; Monte Carlo simulation; stochastic optimisation model; differential evolution algorithm; radial distribution system

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71331001, 71401017, 71420107027]
  3. China Southern Power Grid grant [WYKJ00000027]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources [LAPS14002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the battery energy storage system (BESS) has been considered as a promising solution for mitigating renewable power generation intermittencies. This study proposes a stochastic planning framework for the BESS in distribution networks with high wind power penetrations, aiming to maximise wind power utilisation while minimise the investment and operation costs. In the proposed framework, the uncertainties in wind power output and system load are modelled by the Monte-Carlo simulation, and a chance-constrained stochastic optimisation model is formulated to optimally determine the location and capacity of BESS while ensuring wind power utilisation level. Then, the Monte-Carlo simulation embedded differential evolution algorithm is used to solve the problem. Simulation studies performed on a 15-bus radial distribution system prove the efficiency of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available