4.7 Article

Development of Selective Phosphatidylinositol 5-Phosphate 4-Kinase γ Inhibitors with a Non-ATP-competitive, Allosteric Binding Mode

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 3359-3370

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01819

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Research UK [ARUK-2015DDI-CAM, 1077089, SC042474]
  2. ALBORADA Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinases (PI5P4Ks) are promising therapeutic targets in diseases such as cancer, immunological disorders, and neurodegeneration. In this study, the physicochemical properties of a selective PI5P4K gamma inhibitor were improved, enabling its interaction with PI5P4K gamma in intact cells without inhibiting PI5P4K alpha or PI5P4K beta. The X-ray structure of PI5P4K gamma bound to an inhibitor revealed an allosteric binding mode.
Phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinases (PI5P4Ks) are emerging as attractive therapeutic targets in diseases, such as cancer, immunological disorders, and neurodegeneration, owing to their central role in regulating cell signaling pathways that are either dysfunctional or can be modulated to promote cell survival. Different modes of binding may enhance inhibitor selectivity and reduce off-target effects in cells. Here, we describe efforts to improve the physicochemical properties of the selective PI5P4K gamma inhibitor, NIH-12848 (1). These improvements enabled the demonstration that this chemotype engages PI5P4K gamma in intact cells and that compounds from this series do not inhibit PI5P4K alpha or PI5P4K beta. Furthermore, the first X-ray structure of PI5P4K gamma bound to an inhibitor has been determined with this chemotype, confirming an allosteric binding mode. An exemplar from this chemical series adopted two distinct modes of inhibition, including through binding to a putative lipid interaction site which is 18 angstrom from the ATP pocket.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available