4.7 Article

Discovery of the First Potent IDO1/IDO2 Dual Inhibitors: A Promising Strategy for Cancer Immunotherapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 24, Pages 17950-17968

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21772232, 81872750]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20171388]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified compound4t as the first inhibitor targeting both IDO1/2 with excellent in vitro inhibitory activity. This compound demonstrated significantly stronger in vivo antitumor potency compared to existing drugs in mouse models, highlighting the advantages of IDO1/2 dual inhibitors for tumor immunotherapy. Further mechanistic studies confirmed that 4t exerts its antitumor effect by inhibiting IDO1/2.
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) plays an important role in tumor immune escape. However, unsatisfactoryclinical efficacies of selective IDO1 inhibitors have impeded theirfurther development, suggesting that they do not exert sufficientantitumor effects by selectively inhibiting IDO1. IDO2, anisoenzyme of IDO1, is overexpressed in some human tumors,and emerging evidence suggests that concomitant inhibition ofIDO1/2 may have synergistic effects in cancer treatment, revealinga promising cancer immunotherapeutic strategy. Herein, wedescribe the discovery of compound4t, thefirst inhibitor targetingboth IDO1/2 that has excellentin vitroinhibitory activity (IDO1IC50= 28 nM and IDO2 IC50= 144 nM). Notably,4t(TGI =69.7%) exhibited significantly strongerin vivoantitumor potency than epacadostat (TGI = 49.4%) in CT26 xenograft mouse models,highlighting the advantages of IDO1/2 dual inhibitors for tumor immunotherapy. Preliminary mechanistic studiesin vivofurtheridentified that 4texerts its antitumor effect by inhibiting IDO1/2

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available