4.7 Article

Quality of Life and Multilevel Contact Network Structures Among Healthy Adults in Taiwan: Online Participatory Cohort Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/23762

Keywords

contact diary; egocentric networks; social support; weak ties; World Health Organization Quality of Life Survey; quality of life; networks; demography; society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By integrating demographic and socioeconomic features, this study examines the impact of social networks on quality of life. Findings suggest that both functional and structural aspects of social networks play important but different roles in shaping people's quality of life.
Background: People's quality of life diverges on their demographics, socioeconomic status, and social connections. Objective: By taking both demographic and socioeconomic features into account, we investigated how quality of life varied on social networks using data from both longitudinal surveys and contact diaries in a year-long (2015-2016) study. Methods: Our 4-wave, repeated measures of quality of life followed the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life scale (WHOQOL-BREF). In our regression analysis, we integrated these survey measures with key time-varying and multilevel network indices based on contact diaries. Results: People's quality of life may decrease if their daily contacts contain high proportions of weak ties. In addition, people tend to perceive a better quality of life when their daily contacts are face-to-face or initiated by others or when they contact someone who is in a good mood or someone with whom they can discuss important life issues. Conclusions: Our findings imply that both functional and structural aspects of the social network play important but different roles in shaping people's quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available