4.7 Article

Early Adopters of Apple Health Records at a Large Academic Medical Center: Cross-sectional Survey of Users

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/29367

Keywords

Apple Health Records; personal health record; electronic health record; patient satisfaction; early adopters; cross-sectional survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated early adoption of Apple Health Records (AHR) among patients in the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) and explored user perspectives. The findings revealed that early adopters of AHR were primarily middle-aged, male, and privately insured individuals, with convenience being a significant facilitator.
Background: Mobile applications offer a new approach to personal health records, which are internet-based tools for patients to consolidate and manage their health information. The University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) was one of the first health systems to participate in Apple Health Records (AHR), a prominent example of this new generation of personal health records. Objective: This study aimed to characterize early adoption of AHR among UPHS patients and understand user perspectives. Methods: An email-based survey with fixed answer, Likert scale, and open-ended questions was administered to all UPHS patients using AHR in the first 10 months of enrollment. Survey data linked to the UPHS electronic health record system were used to analyze responses. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association of patient characteristics with user ratings. Content analysis was used to analyze open-ended questions. Results: At the time of the survey, a total of 1458 patients had used AHR at least once. Mean age of AHR users was 47.5 years, 66.3% (967/1458) were male, 70.9% (1033/1458) were white, and 80.8% (1178/1458) had private insurance. Response rate was 26.8% (391/1458); 46.3% (180/389) were very satisfied with AHR, and 67.7% (264/390) described it as very easy to use. The most commonly utilized features were lab results (324/391, 82.9%), clinical vitals (264/391, 67.5%), and medications (253/391, 64.7%). No patient characteristics were associated with reporting high satisfaction or ease of use. The most common reason for using AHR was convenience/ease of use, and 58.2% (160/275) of users reported allowing no other apps to access their health information, citing privacy as one consideration. Conclusions: Early adopters of AHR were demographically white, male, and privately insured. Convenience was an important facilitator, and users were selective in which apps they allowed to access their health information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available