4.7 Article

Usability, Acceptability, and Satisfaction of a Wearable Activity Tracker in Older Adults: Observational Study in a Real-Life Context in Northern Portugal

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/26652

Keywords

user experience; Technology Acceptance Model; health monitoring; fitness trackers; aging; seniors

Funding

  1. FEDER funds through the Operational Programme Competitiveness Factors - COMPETE
  2. National Funds through FCT [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007038, UIDB/50026/2020, UIDP/50026/2020, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023]
  3. North Portugal Regional Operational Programme
  4. European Regional Development Fund [FEDER]
  5. Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization [COMPETE 2020] [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016428]
  6. Regional Operational Program of Lisbon
  7. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [FCT, Portugal]
  8. Portuguese North Regional Operational Programme (ON.2 - O Novo Norte, under the National Strategic Reference Framework [QREN] , through FEDER)
  9. FCT
  10. iCognitus4ALL - IT Solutions, Lda, Braga, Portugal [PD/BDE/127831/2016]
  11. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BDE/127831/2016] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the acceptability, usability, and user satisfaction of the Xiaomi Mi Band 2 among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults. The results showed that usability is a determinant of satisfaction with the technology and confirmed the suitability of the Xiaomi Mi Band 2 for older adults.
Background: The use of activity trackers has significantly increased over the last few years. This technology has the potential to improve the levels of physical activity and health-related behaviors in older adults. However, despite the potential benefits, the rate of adoption remains low among older adults. Therefore, understanding how technology is perceived may potentially offer insight to promote its use. Objective: This study aimed to (1) assess acceptability, usability, and user satisfaction with the Xiaomi Mi Band 2 in Portuguese community-dwelling older adults in a real-world context; (2) explore the mediating effect of the usability on the relationship between user characteristics and satisfaction; and (3) examine the moderating effect of user characteristics on the relationship between usability and user satisfaction. Methods: Older adults used the Xiaomi Mi Band 2 over 15 days. The user experience was evaluated through the Technology Acceptance Model 3, System Usability Scale, and User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire. An integrated framework for usability and user satisfaction was used to explore user experience. Statistical data analysis included descriptive data analysis, reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and mediation and moderation analyses. Results: A sample of 110 older adults with an average age of 68.41 years (SD 3.11) completed the user experience questionnaires. Mean user acceptance was very high-perceived ease of use: 6.45 (SD 0.78); perceptions of external control: 6.74 (SD 0.55); computer anxiety: 6.85 (SD 0.47); and behavioral intention: 6.60 (SD 0.97). The usability was excellent with an average score of 92.70 (SD 10.73), and user satisfaction was classified as a good experience 23.30 (SD 2.40). The mediation analysis confirmed the direct positive effect of usability on satisfaction (beta=.530; P<.01) and the direct negative effect of depression on usability (beta=-.369; P<.01). Lastly, the indirect effect of usability on user satisfaction was higher in individuals with lower Geriatric Depression Scale levels. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that the Xiaomi Mi Band 2 is suitable for older adults. Furthermore, the results confirmed usability as a determinant of satisfaction with the technology and extended the existing knowledge about wearable activity trackers in older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available