4.5 Article

Neurofibromatosis type 1 families with first-degree relatives harbouring distinct NF1 pathogenic variants. Genetic counselling and familial diagnosis: what should be offered?

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 59, Issue 10, Pages 1017-1023

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Children's Tumor Tumour Foundation [CTF-2019-05-005]
  2. Spanish Association of NF Affected (AANF)
  3. Fundacion Proyecto Neurofibromatosis
  4. Ministry Science and Innovation [PI20/00 215]
  5. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [126/C/C/2020]
  6. Generalitat of Catalonia [2017 SGR 496]
  7. Catalan NF Association (AcNeFi)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that offspring of male patients with NF1 may have an increased risk of experiencing de novo NF1 pathogenic variants, which has important implications for NF1 genetic counseling, family planning, and NF1 genetic testing.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in NF1. Recently, NF1 testing has been included as a clinical criterion for NF1 diagnosis. Additionally, preconception genetic counselling in patients with NF1 focuses on a 50% risk of transmitting the familial variant as the risk of having a sporadic NF1 is considered the same as the general population. Methods 829 individuals, 583 NF1 sporadic cases and 246 patients with NF1 with documented family history, underwent genetic testing for NF1. Genotyping and segregation analysis of NF1 familial variants was determined by microsatellite analysis and NF1 sequencing. Results The mutational analysis of NF1 in 154 families with two or more affected cases studied showed the co-occurrence of two different NF1 germline pathogenic variants in four families. The estimated mutation rate in those families was 3.89x10(-3), 20 times higher than the NF1 mutation rate (similar to 2x10(-4)) (p=0.0008). Furthermore, the co-occurrence of two different NF1 germline pathogenic variants in these families was 1:39, 60 times the frequency of sporadic NF1 (1:2500) (p=0.003). In all cases, the de novo NF1 pathogenic variant was present in a descendant of an affected male. In two cases, variants were detected in the inherited paternal wild-type allele. Conclusions Our results, together with previous cases reported, suggest that the offspring of male patients with NF1 could have an increased risk of experiencing de novo NF1 pathogenic variants. This observation, if confirmed in additional cohorts, could have relevant implications for NF1 genetic counselling, family planning and NF1 genetic testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available