4.6 Article

Natural outcome of cannabis use disorder: a 3-year longitudinal follow-up

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages 1963-1974

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.13071

Keywords

Abuse; cannabis use disorder; dependence; longitudinal follow-up; NESARC; non-abstinent remission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo assess the prevalence and correlates of remission from cannabis use disorders (CUDs), focusing on the proportion of individuals with CUDs that remit without abstaining from cannabis use. DesignThree-year longitudinal study. SettingWave 1 (2001) and wave 2 (2004) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a nationally representative sample of US adults aged 18years and over. ParticipantsOur sample included 444 individuals diagnosed with DSM-IV cannabis abuse and/or dependence during the 12months prior to wave 1 of the NESARC. MeasurementsBaseline socio-demographic and clinical correlates were analysed for possible outcomes of CUDs after 3years: abstinent remission, non-abstinent remission and sustained disorder. FindingsApproximately two-thirds (67%) of individuals with baseline CUD remitted at follow-up. Approximately 37% of those who remitted were non-abstinent. Remission was associated with Hispanic ethnicity [odds ratio (OR)=2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27-4.87], baseline daily or almost daily use of cannabis (OR=1.91; 95% CI=1.15-3.16), baseline use of other drugs (OR=1.63; 95% CI=1.04-2.56) and two or more medical conditions at baseline (OR=8.40; 95% CI=2.67-26.41). Non-abstinent remission was associated with baseline daily or almost daily use of cannabis (OR=1.92; 95% CI=1.05-3.51). ConclusionsA substantial level of remission from cannabis use disorders (CUDs), including non-abstinent remission, suggests that the nature of CUDs may be more unstable than reported previously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available