4.1 Article

Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the IPECC-SET 9 item version

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 900-907

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2034762

Keywords

Collaborative practice; interprofessional competence; interprofessional education; Rasch model; self-efficacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study translated and validated the Swedish version of IPECC-SET 9, demonstrating its sound psychometric properties and potential for measuring self-efficacy in interprofessional collaborative practice among health profession students. Further testing in larger samples representing health-care teams is recommended.
Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential to prepare future health-care professionals for collaborative practice, but IPE requires evaluation. One psychometrically sound instrument is the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competence Self-Efficacy Tool consisting of nine items (IPECC-SET 9). This tool does not, to date, exist in a Swedish version. Therefore, the aim of this study was to translate and validate the Swedish version of the IPECC-SET 9. The English version was translated into Swedish and tested among 159 students in the 3-year Bachelor Programs in Nursing and in Biomedical Laboratory Science. The psychometric analysis was guided by a Rasch model, which showed that the items functioned well together, confirming unidimensionality, and that the person misfit was also lower than the set criterion. The separation index was 2.98, and the Rasch-equivalent Cronbach-alpha measure was estimated to .92, supporting internal consistency. No systematic differences on item level in IPECC-SET 9 further supported fairness in testing. The Swedish IPECC-SET 9 demonstrates sound psychometric properties and has the potential to be used as a measure of self-efficacy for competence in interprofessional collaborative practice among health profession students. However, the IPECC-SET 9 is recommended to be further tested in larger samples representing the entirety of health-care teams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available