4.1 Article

Interprofessional experiences to bridge the medical school to residency transition: a pilot program

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 941-945

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1990229

Keywords

Interprofessional education; transition to residency; medical education continuum; medical education; internship; residency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the value of implementing specialty-specific interprofessional curriculum during residency preparation courses for senior students in improving their perceptions of interprofessional roles. Post-surveys showed improvement in self-reported ability in understanding and collaborating with interprofessional teams, while follow-up surveys indicated that clinical experiences were slightly-to-moderately useful and the paging curriculum was rated very-to-extremely useful.
Interprofessional experiences during medical school are often delivered during pre-clinical years, but less is known about the value of clinical students. Our institution implemented a specialty-specific interprofessiona curriculum during Residency Preparation Courses (RPCs) for senior students including didactics, clinical experiences, and a simulated paging curriculum. Our aim was to determine whether this intervention improved perceptions of interprofesiona roles. We distributed anonymous surveys before (pre-survey) and after (post-survey, collected within 2 weeks of course completion) the RPC to 90 students with questions related to interprofessional roles using a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Three months after the start of residency, we sent follow-up surveys inquiring about the usefulness of RPC components (1 = not at all useful, 5 = extremely useful). Response rates were 84.4% pre-survey, 63.3% post-survey, and 41.1% follow-up survey. Post-surveys indicated improvement in self-reported ability in all domains: understanding one's contributions to interprofessional teams (3.9 to 4.4, p < .0001), understanding other team members' contributions (3.9 to 4.4, p < .0001), learning from interprofessional team members (4.2 to 4.6, p = .0002), accounting for interprofessional perspectives (4.2 to 4.6, p < .0001), and co-developing effective care plans (3.9 to 4.4, p < .0001). Follow-up surveys rated clinical experiences as slightly-to-moderately useful (2.3 +/- 1.0) and paging curriculum very-to-extremely useful (4.3 +/- 1.0). This study demonstrates the value of interprofessional education for advanced students.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available