4.7 Article

The first wave of COVID-19 and concurrent social restrictions were not associated with a negative impact on mental health and psychiatric well-being

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 291, Issue 6, Pages 837-848

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joim.13461

Keywords

COVID-19; pandemics; mental health

Funding

  1. Black Swan/International Myeloma Foundation
  2. European Union Horizon 2020 research framework
  3. Icelandic Centre for Research
  4. University of Iceland Research Fund
  5. Landspitali University Hospital Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the impact of the initial COVID-19 wave and associated social restrictions on the mental health of a large adult population. The findings suggest that social restrictions were effective in containing the pandemic without negatively impacting measures of mental illness or psychiatric well-being.
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and efforts to contain it have substantially affected the daily lives of most of the world's population. Objective We describe the impact of the first COVID-19 wave and associated social restrictions on the mental health of a large adult population. Methods We performed a cohort study nested in a prospective randomized clinical trial, comparing responses during the first COVID-19 wave to previous responses. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) of the population moving up one severity category on validated instruments used to measure stress (PSS-10), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Responses were linked to inpatient and outpatient ICD-10 codes from registries. Models were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and pre-existing diagnoses of mental illness. Results Of 63,848 invited participants, 42,253 (66%) responded. The median age was 60 (inter-quartile range 53-68) and 19,032 (45%) were male. Responses during the first wave of COVID-19 did not suggest increased stress (OR 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.01; p = 0.28) or anxiety (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.05; p = 0.61), but were associated with decreased depression (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.93, p < 0.0001) and increased satisfaction with life (OR 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16, p < 0.0001). A secondary analysis of repeated measures data showed similar results. Conclusions Social restrictions were sufficient to contain the pandemic but did not negatively impact validated measures of mental illness or psychiatric well-being. However, responses to individual questions showed signs of fear and stress. This may represent a normal, rather than pathological, population response to a stressful situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available