4.2 Article

Topical Effects of N-Acetyl Cysteine and Doxycycline on Inflammatory and Angiogenic Factors in the Rat Model of Alkali-Burned Cornea

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERFERON AND CYTOKINE RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 82-89

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jir.2021.0150

Keywords

corneal neovascularization; doxycycline; inflammation; N-acetyl cysteine; NaOH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to analyze the effects of NAC and Dox on inflammatory and angiogenic factors in alkali-burned corneas. The combined NAC and Dox treatment increased SOD enzyme activity and reduced the expression of inflammatory factors, while Dox alone decreased corneal neovascularization levels.
The aim of this study was to analyze the single and combined effects of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and doxycycline (Dox) on the inflammatory and angiogenic factors in the rat model of alkali-burned cornea. Rats were treated with a single and combined 0.5% NAC and 12.5 mu g/mL Dox eye drops and evaluated on days 3, 7, and 28. In the corneas of various groups, the activity of Catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) enzymes was assessed. The expression of inflammatory factors (TNF-alpha, Rel-alpha, and CXCL-1) and angiogenic factors (VEGF-alpha, MMP2, and MMP9) was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The antioxidant enzyme activities decreased substantially 3 days after injury with sodium hydroxide (NaOH). NAC and combined NAC+ Dox topical treatments increased the SOD enzyme activity on day 28 (P < 0.05). The expression of TNF-alpha and Rel-alpha genes following single and combined treatment of NAC and Dox decreased significantly on days 7 and 28 (P < 0.05). The mRNA level of angiogenic factors and corneal neovascularization (CNV) level declined in NaOH-injured rats treated with Dox (P < 0.05). The topical treatment of Dox could attenuate inflammation and CNV complications. However, NAC treatment may not reduce the expression of angiogenic genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available